Best Eat App alternatives for restaurants 2026

The best Eat App alternative for most restaurants is Resos because it delivers the same core reservation features with simpler, more transparent pricing and no expensive add-ons. Start free with 25 bookings/month, then scale to paid plans from $24/month with zero cover fees and no annual contracts.

Key takeaways

• Best overall alternative: Resos, free tier available, no cover fees, $24-149/month with no add-on surprises
• Best for diner discovery: OpenTable, largest booking network, $149-499/month plus per-cover fees
• Best for UK/European restaurants: ResDiary, established since 2006, quote-based pricing
• Best for Baltic/Nordic simplicity: Tablein, free tier, no cover fees, straightforward pricing from EUR 59/month
• Best for Nordic guest experience: Superb, guest experience management, EUR 79-149/month
• Best for ticketed/prepaid dining: Tock, prepaid reservations, $199-699/month

Best Eat App alternatives at a glance

Why look for Eat App alternatives?

Eat App is a capable mid-market reservation platform with genuinely strong analytics and CRM tools. It has earned a solid reputation in the Middle East and Asia, and its reporting features, especially on the Pro plan, are among the best in the category.

But several pricing and structural issues push restaurant operators to look elsewhere.

The pricing complexity:

• Four paid tiers create confusion about which plan you actually need
• Annual billing required for the lowest advertised prices ($49-229/month)
• Monthly billing jumps significantly: $79, $179, $319/month
• POS integration costs an extra $89/month on Starter and Essential plans
• Phone integration adds another $25/month

Visit Eat App for current pricing (as of February 2026).

The add-on problem:

• POS integration, one of Eat App’s headline features, costs $89/month unless you’re on the Pro plan ($229/month annual)
• A Starter plan customer wanting POS integration pays $49 + $89 = $138/month (annual) or $79 + $89 = $168/month (monthly)
• That pricing lands you close to what competitors charge for full-featured plans with everything included
• SMS confirmations are limited by plan tier (25-300/month), which can restrict busy restaurants

The feature gating:

• Revenue tracking and advanced analytics require Essential ($129/month) or higher
• Custom dashboards, shift performance reports, and review management are locked to Pro ($229/month)
• The free plan’s 30-cover limit is exhausted by most restaurants within a few days
• The Starter plan’s 300-cover cap still restricts moderately busy restaurants

If your main reason for choosing Eat App was analytics, you may find that simpler platforms cover 80% of what you need at 30-50% of the cost. And if you were drawn by POS integration, the add-on pricing makes it less competitive than it first appears.

1. Resos: best overall alternative

Why Resos is our top pick:

Resos delivers the core features most restaurants need from a reservation platform at a price point that undercuts Eat App across every tier, with no add-on surprises.

Promotional pricing is 50% off for the first 6 months. No annual commitment required.

Why choose Resos over Eat App:

• Free tier with 25 bookings/month, no credit card required
• Zero cover fees on any plan
• Month-to-month billing (no annual billing pressure)
• No expensive add-ons for POS integration or phone features
• Full table management, guest profiles, and reporting included
• Setup takes under an hour

Head-to-head pricing comparison:

Annual savings vs Eat App: A restaurant on Eat App’s Essential plan ($129/month annual) switching to Resos Plus ($49/month promo or $98/month regular) saves $372-$960 annually. Add POS integration to the Eat App side, and the savings grow to $1,440-$2,028.

Trade-offs: Eat App’s analytics and CRM depth exceeds what Resos offers, particularly on the Pro plan. If advanced revenue tracking and POS-linked guest spend data are critical to your operation, that’s a genuine capability gap. For the majority of restaurants that need solid reservation management without enterprise-level analytics, Resos covers the fundamentals at a better price.

Best for: Independent restaurants, cost-conscious operators, and anyone who wants predictable monthly costs without add-on surprises. Read our full Eat App vs Resos comparison for a detailed breakdown.

2. OpenTable: best for diner discovery

Why consider OpenTable:

If your primary reason for exploring alternatives is guest acquisition rather than analytics, OpenTable’s marketplace is unmatched. The largest diner network in the industry sends new customers directly to your restaurant, something Eat App’s platform-only approach doesn’t offer.

See OpenTable pricing for current rates (as of February 2026).

Why choose OpenTable over Eat App:

• Largest diner network drives new customer discovery
• Strong brand recognition among diners globally
• Comprehensive feature set at every tier
• Robust reporting and analytics without expensive add-ons
• Free trial available

Trade-offs:

• Per-cover fees of $1.00-$1.50 add up at volume (a restaurant doing 1,000 covers/month pays $1,000-$1,500 in cover fees alone)
• Monthly subscription is higher than Eat App’s mid-tier plans
• Less control over customer relationships compared to Eat App’s CRM
• Costs scale with success, punishing growth

Best for: Restaurants prioritizing new customer acquisition. If filling seats is a bigger challenge than optimizing operations, OpenTable’s marketplace exposure may justify the per-cover fees that Eat App avoids.

3. ResDiary: best for UK and European restaurants

Why consider ResDiary:

ResDiary has operated since 2006 with deep roots in the UK, Europe, and Australia. If you’re running a restaurant outside of Eat App’s strongest markets (Middle East and Asia), ResDiary offers better regional support and a wider integration network for European POS systems.

Why choose ResDiary over Eat App:

• Established track record since 2006
• Strong presence in UK, Europe, and Australia with local support teams
• Comprehensive feature set including CRM, waitlist, and reporting
• Good integration options with European POS systems
• Free trial available to test before committing

Trade-offs:

• Quote-based pricing with no published rates (less transparent than Eat App)
• Interface can feel dated compared to newer platforms
• Less brand recognition in North America and Middle East
• Sales process required to get pricing

Best for: UK and European restaurants that want a proven, locally supported reservation platform. Eat App’s stronger markets are the Middle East and Asia, so European operators may find ResDiary a more natural fit with better regional infrastructure.

4. Tablein: best for Baltic and Nordic simplicity

Why consider Tablein:

Tablein takes the opposite approach to Eat App’s feature-heavy strategy. It focuses on doing reservation management simply and well, without layers of analytics, add-ons, and tiered feature gates. For restaurants that don’t need Eat App’s CRM depth, Tablein’s straightforward approach is refreshing.

Visit Tablein for current pricing (as of February 2026).

Why choose Tablein over Eat App:

• Free tier available (no cover limit like Eat App’s 30-cover cap on specifics)
• No per-cover fees on any plan
• Simple, clear pricing with no add-on costs
• User-friendly interface with minimal learning curve
• Strong in Baltic and Nordic markets

Trade-offs:

• Smaller feature set than Eat App, especially in analytics and CRM
• No consumer marketplace for diner discovery
• Limited brand recognition outside Northern Europe
• Basic marketing tools compared to Eat App’s automation

Best for: Baltic and Nordic restaurants that want reliable booking management without feature bloat. If Eat App’s analytics aren’t something you actively use, Tablein gives you what you need at a lower price with less complexity.

5. Superb: best for Nordic guest experience

Why consider Superb:

Superb is a Copenhagen-based guest experience management platform that competes with Eat App on CRM and guest data, but through a different lens. Where Eat App focuses on POS-linked analytics, Superb focuses on the full guest journey from booking through post-visit engagement.

Visit Superb for current pricing (as of February 2026).

Why choose Superb over Eat App:

• No per-cover fees (same as Eat App)
• Guest experience management with a focus on the full dining journey
• Strong prepayment and deposit features to reduce no-shows
• Nordic and European market expertise
• Cleaner approach to guest data without expensive add-ons

Trade-offs:

• No free tier available
• Higher starting price than Eat App’s Starter plan
• Smaller diner network than marketplace platforms
• Less brand recognition outside Nordic and European markets
• Analytics less POS-focused than Eat App’s Pro plan

Best for: Nordic and European restaurants that care about guest experience management and want a platform focused on the dining journey, without the add-on pricing complexity of Eat App.

6. Tock: best for ticketed and prepaid dining

Why consider Tock:

Tock occupies a different niche than Eat App. While Eat App focuses on analytics and CRM for traditional reservation flow, Tock specializes in prepaid and ticketed dining experiences. If no-shows are costing you revenue, or you run tasting menus and special events, Tock’s prepayment model solves a problem that Eat App’s approach doesn’t address.

See Tock pricing for current rates (as of February 2026).

Why choose Tock over Eat App:

• Prepaid reservations reduce no-shows to near zero
• Built specifically for tasting menus and ticketed experiences
• Strong reputation in the fine dining segment
• Special event management and pop-up support
• Revenue is secured at the time of booking, not after the meal

Trade-offs:

• 2% transaction fee on Plus plan (waived on $699/month Pro plan)
• $199/month minimum with no free tier
• Overkill for standard reservations at casual restaurants
• Steep learning curve for ticketed dining setup

Best for: Fine dining with tasting menus, ticketed events, and restaurants losing significant revenue to no-shows. Eat App tracks revenue after the fact through analytics; Tock secures it upfront through prepayment.

How to choose the right Eat App alternative

Choose Resos if:

• You want transparent pricing with no add-on fees
• You need a free tier to start or keep costs at zero
• You prefer month-to-month flexibility over annual billing
• You want solid reservation management without paying for analytics you won’t fully use

Choose OpenTable if:

• New customer discovery is your biggest challenge
• You want the largest booking marketplace in the industry
• You’re willing to pay per-cover fees for exposure
• Your priority is filling seats, not tracking guest spend data

Choose ResDiary if:

• You’re based in the UK, Europe, or Australia
• You want regional support from a locally established platform
• You need strong European POS integrations
• Eat App’s Middle East/Asia focus doesn’t match your market

Choose Tablein if:

• You want the simplest possible booking system
• You’re in the Baltic or Nordic region
• Feature depth matters less than ease of use
• You want a free tier without Eat App’s 30-cover limit

Choose Superb if:

• You want guest experience management, not just reservations
• You’re in the Nordic or European market
• You care about the full dining journey, from booking to follow-up
• No-cover-fee pricing matters to your operation

Choose Tock if:

• You offer tasting menus or ticketed dining experiences
• Prepaid reservations are critical for reducing no-shows
• You run special events and pop-ups regularly
• You want to secure revenue at the time of booking

The bottom line

Eat App built a capable platform with genuinely strong analytics and CRM tools. Its revenue tracking and POS-linked guest profiles are real differentiators, especially on the Pro plan. For data-driven operators who actively use those capabilities, Eat App delivers value.

But for the majority of restaurants, the add-on pricing, annual billing requirements, and feature gating push total costs higher than they first appear. A restaurant wanting POS integration on the Starter plan pays $138-168/month. The Essential plan with POS reaches $218-268/month. At those price points, you’re paying a premium for analytics that many operators never fully leverage.

Resos offers the best alternative for most restaurants: transparent pricing, a free tier to get started, no add-on fees, and month-to-month flexibility. The annual savings typically range from $372 to $2,028 depending on your current Eat App plan and add-ons.

For restaurants with specific needs like diner discovery (OpenTable), ticketed dining (Tock), or European regional support (ResDiary), other alternatives are worth exploring. The right choice depends on whether you need Eat App’s analytical depth or whether simpler, more affordable software covers what your operation actually requires day to day.

Related: Eat App vs Resos | OpenTable alternatives | SevenRooms alternatives | Resy alternatives

Sources

• Eat App pricing
• Eat App features
• Resos pricing
• OpenTable pricing
• ResDiary
• Tablein
• Superb
• Tock for restaurants