A reservation system can provide controls for managing no-show risk, but it cannot promise a particular outcome. The Resos No-Show Index 2026 recorded a 2.33% no-show rate across 3.77 million eligible reservations at 2,417 restaurants. Only restaurants that recorded at least one no-show were included, so the overall rate may be higher.
Use this comparison to identify the controls that fit your restaurant. Then measure bookings, recorded no-shows, late cancellations, and backfilled tables before and after any policy or workflow change.
Tools to compare
| Platform | Documented controls to evaluate | Suitable context |
|---|---|---|
| Tock | Prepaid and ticketed reservations, cancellation policies, transfer options, waitlist | Fixed-price meals, events, and tasting menus |
| Resos | Configurable deposits, SMS and email reminders, cancellation paths, waitlist | Restaurants that want configurable reservation workflows |
| Resy | Card guarantees, cancellation policies, notifications, waitlist features | Restaurants whose guests expect a card policy |
| OpenTable | Confirmation and reminder tools, cancellation policies, waitlist and experience features | Restaurants using its discovery and reservation network |
| Eat App | Guest history, reminder workflows, confirmation tools, waitlist and forecasting features | Teams that want to review booking data alongside workflows |
Availability, plan limits, and pricing can change. Confirm details directly with each platform before making a purchase.
Choose controls that match the service
Prepayment and deposits
Prepayment or a deposit can be appropriate for fixed-price events, large parties, peak periods, or services with limited resale opportunities. They add terms to the booking, so compare booking volume and attendance with a stable period before the change. Publicly reported deposit rates do not establish a causal effect because the restaurants and bookings that use deposits can differ from those that do not.
Card guarantees and cancellation policies
A card-on-file and a clearly stated cancellation policy can give the team a process for handling late changes. Check that the policy is understandable at booking, appropriate for local rules, and applied consistently.
Reminders and confirmation requests
Evaluate the channels, timing, templates, reply handling, and cancellation path. The Index found that delivered SMS reminders were associated with a 16% lower recorded no-show rate in an observational comparison within the same restaurants. This does not prove that SMS caused the difference or guarantee a result for another restaurant.
Waitlists and released tables
Waitlist tools can help the team offer a released table to other guests. The relevant local measure is the share of late cancellations or no-shows that the team can actually backfill, not a universal savings claim.
A practical evaluation process
- Define eligible reservations and record no-shows and late cancellations separately.
- Identify the services where a released table is hardest to fill.
- Select one workflow change, such as a reminder template or a policy for large parties.
- Track booking volume, recorded no-shows, late cancellations, and backfilled tables for a stable period.
- Keep, adapt, or stop the change based on your own results and guest feedback.
Methodology
This page compares booking controls described in the platforms’ public restaurant materials. It does not rank platforms by a universal no-show reduction rate, expected savings, or return on investment. Actual outcomes depend on the restaurant, its policy, guest mix, demand, and implementation.
Sources
- Tock for restaurants
- Resos
- Resy for restaurants
- OpenTable restaurant solutions
- Eat App for restaurants